Exploring Associations between Stressors and Burnout in Trainee Doctors During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the UK.

OBJECTIVE: The authors examined associations between stressors and burnout in trainee doctors during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: An anonymous online questionnaire including 42 questions on general and pandemic-specific stressors, and the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Health Services Survey (MBI-HSS), was sent to 1000 randomly selected trainee doctors in North-West England. Main outcomes were burnout scores that were stratified into Emotional Exhaustion (EE), Depersonalisation (DP), and reduced Personal Accomplishment (PA) and associations between stressors and burnout using stepwise regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 362 complete responses were received giving a response rate of 37%. Mean scores for EE, DP, and PA derived from the MBI-HSS were 27.7, 9.8, and 34.3 respectively. Twenty-three stressors were found to be associated with burnout dimensions. "Increase in workload and hours due to COVID-19," "Poor leadership and management in the National Health Service," and "Not feeling valued" were found to have strong associations with burnout dimensions. Only "Not confident in own abilities" was found to be associated with all burnout dimensions. CONCLUSIONS: Associations with burnout were found to be identified in a range of work, pandemic, and non-work-related stressors, supporting the need for multi-level interventions to mitigate burnout.

Cross-sectional study exploring the association between stressors and burnout in junior doctors during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to develop a comprehensive list of stressors relevant to junior doctors and will also report findings exploring the associations between burnout and stressors, which include work and non-work-related stressors as well as pandemic-related stressors. METHODS: An anonymous online questionnaire was sent to 1000 randomly selected junior doctors in the North-West of England. The questionnaire included 37 questions on general and pandemic-specific stressors, and the Maslach Burnout Inventory Health Services Survey. The main outcomes of interest were junior doctor ratings of stressors and scores for burnout (emotional exhaustion [EE], depersonalisation [DP], and personal accomplishment [PA]). Stepwise regression analysis was undertaken to assess associations between stressors and burnout. RESULTS: In total, 326 responses were collected (response rate = 33%). Of the top 10 stressors rated by junior doctors, 60% were related to the pandemic. Multiple stressors were found to be associated with the burnout dimensions. Fatigue (ß = .43), pandemic-related workload increase (ß = .33), and feeling isolated (ß = .24) had the strongest associations with EE, whereas fatigue (ß = .21), uncertainty around COVID-19 information (ß = .22) and doing unproductive tasks (ß = .17) had the strongest associations with DP. Working beyond normal scope due to COVID-19 (ß = -.26), not confident in own ability (ß = -.24) and not feeling valued (ß = -.20) were found to have the strongest associations with PA. CONCLUSIONS: Junior doctors experience a combination of general stressors and additional stressors emerging from the pandemic which significantly impact burnout. Monitoring these stressors and targeting them as part of interventions could help mitigating burnout in junior doctors.

Contributors to stress and burnout in junior doctors during the COVID-19 pandemic

IntroductionJunior doctors have previously reported high levels of burnout;and additional stressors have likely emerged from the COVID-19 pandemic may further accelerate burnout. There is a need to identify which particular stressors are most likely to lead to burnout in junior doctors in order to develop appropriate interventions. Objectives1) To develop a comprehensive list of stressors that are relevant to junior doctors, which includes general work and non-work related stressors as well as stressors that have specifically emerged with the pandemic. 2) To assess which of these stressors are most strongly associated with burnout.MethodsAn anonymous online questionnaire was sent to 1000 randomly selected junior doctors in the North West of England between 10/07/20 to 04/08/20. It included 37 questions on general and pandemic-specific stressors, and the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) Health Services Survey. Stepwise regression analyses were undertaken to assess associations between stressors and burnout.ResultsIn total, 326 responses were collected (response rate=33%). Of the top 10 stressors rated by junior doctors, 60% were related to the pandemic. Multiple stressors were found to be associated with the burnout dimensions. Fatigue (β=0.43), pandemic-related workload increase (β=0.33) and feeling isolated (β=0.24) had the strongest associations with Emotional Exhaustion, whereas fatigue (β=0.24), uncertainty around COVID-19 information (β=0.22) and doing unproductive tasks (β =0.22) had the strongest associations with Depersonalisation.ConclusionJunior doctors experience a combination of general stressors and additional stressors emerging from the pandemic which significantly to impact on burnout. Monitoring these stressors and targeting them as part of interventions could help mitigating burnout in junior doctors.

The Development of a COVID-19 Control Measures Risk Matrix for Occupational Hygiene Protective Measures.

The British Occupational Hygiene Society (BOHS) COVID-19 Working Group developed a control banding matrix to provide guidance for employers and others to help assess the risks of COVID-19 infection during the pandemic. The matrix was based on occupational hygiene principles and the judgement of the occupational health practitioners involved; since objective data on workers' exposure were unavailable. Users of the matrix identify one of five exposure categories based on generic job descriptions and example occupations, and these categories are linked to generic guidance on interventions at source, on the exposure pathway and for individual workers. The risk matrix was published on the BOHS website and the guidance has been downloaded more than 2000 times. The matrix has had limited evaluation for reliability, but the data suggest that the highest exposure ranked jobs were associated with higher age-standardized mortality in Britain during the pandemic. However, there was considerable variability in exposure assignments between assessors, which underlines the need for the control guidance to be precautionary. The BOHS calls on academic researchers to undertake further work to validate the reliability of the tool.

On the importance of primary and community healthcare in relation to global health and environmental threats: lessons from the COVID-19 crisis.

In the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, it has become clear that primary healthcare systems play a critical role in clinical care, such as patient screening, triage, physical and psychological support and also in promoting good community advice and awareness in coordination with secondary healthcare and preventive care. Because of the role of social and environmental factors in COVID-19 transmission and burden of disease, it is essential to ensure that there is adequate coordination of population-based health services and public health interventions. The COVID-19 pandemic has shown the primary and community healthcare (P&CHC) system's weaknesses worldwide. In many instances, P&CHC played only a minor role, the emphasis being on hospital and intensive care beds. This was compounded by political failures, in supporting local community resilience. Placing community building, social cohesion and resilience at the forefront of dealing with the COVID-19 crisis can help align solutions that provide a vision of 'planetary health'. This can be achieved by involving local well-being and participation in the face of any pervasive health and environmental crisis, including other epidemics and large-scale ecological crises. This paper proposes that P&CHC should take on two critical roles: first, to support local problem-solving efforts and to serve as a partner in innovative approaches to safeguarding community well-being; and second, to understand the local environment and health risks in the context of the global health perspective. We see this as an opportunity of immediate value and broad consequence beyond the control of the COVID-19 pandemic.